Every outlet — left, right, and everywhere between — has an incentive to grab your attention before it informs you, using the same playbook: fear, anger, tribalism. This page calls that out consistently, regardless of which direction it's coming from, and links to the day's stories with an honest label on which ones are reporting and which are someone's take.
Answers who, what, when, where — sourced to named people, documents, or records. A correction policy exists if it's wrong. The goal is that two people who disagree politically could both read it and agree on what happened.
Answers what it means or what should happen next. It's argument, interpretation, or prediction — often smart and worth reading, but it's one person's case, not a neutral account. Reputable outlets label this "Opinion" or "Analysis" for a reason.
A running log of stories worth your attention, tagged by what kind of piece they are.
Replace this with a plain, one- or two-sentence summary of what the story actually reports — not your take on it. Save your take for a piece tagged "Commentary" below, or for your own separate note.
Read the original story →Replace this with a summary of the argument being made and by whom — e.g. "A columnist at [outlet] argues that..." — so readers know upfront this is one person's interpretation, not a neutral report.
Read the original piece →